↓ Skip to main content

The Enigmatic Gut in Cystic Fibrosis: Linking Inflammation, Dysbiosis, and the Increased Risk of Malignancy

Overview of attention for article published in Current Gastroenterology Reports, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 368)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
The Enigmatic Gut in Cystic Fibrosis: Linking Inflammation, Dysbiosis, and the Increased Risk of Malignancy
Published in
Current Gastroenterology Reports, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11894-017-0546-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Millie Garg, Chee Y. Ooi

Abstract

Intestinal inflammation, dysbiosis, and increased gastrointestinal malignancy risks are well-described in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). However, there is limited understanding of their pathophysiology. This review aims to discuss these issues and assess potential links between them. Evidence of links between intestinal inflammation and dysbiosis (an imbalance in intestinal microbial populations) exist. Recent studies have demonstrated reduction in intestinal inflammation with probiotic administration. Both bacterial dysbiosis and gut inflammation contribute to the suboptimal nutritional status seen in children with CF. Short-chain fatty acids may be reduced in the gut lumen as a result of bacterial imbalances and may promote inflammation. Inflammation and bacterial dysbiosis in CF may also contribute to emerging adult complications such as gastrointestinal malignancy. An increase in carcinogenic microbes and reduction in microbes protective against cancer have been found in CF, linking bacterial dysbiosis and cancer. Murine studies suggest the CF gene, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, itself may be a tumour suppressor gene. The pathophysiology of interactions among intestinal inflammation, dysbiosis, and malignancy in CF is not clearly understood and requires further research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 20%
Student > Bachelor 15 18%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 7%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 15 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2018.
All research outputs
#2,579,685
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Current Gastroenterology Reports
#38
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,645
of 425,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Gastroenterology Reports
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them