Title |
‘Doing Something Positive’: Volunteers’ Experiences of the Well-Being Benefits Derived from Practical Conservation Activities in Nature
|
---|---|
Published in |
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, July 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11266-010-9149-1 |
Authors |
Liz O’Brien, Mardie Townsend, Matthew Ebden |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 1% |
Australia | 2 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 172 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 15% |
Student > Master | 25 | 14% |
Researcher | 23 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 11% |
Other | 9 | 5% |
Other | 40 | 22% |
Unknown | 40 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 39 | 21% |
Environmental Science | 26 | 14% |
Psychology | 19 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 6% |
Other | 30 | 16% |
Unknown | 43 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,919,343
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations
#79
of 794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,255
of 109,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them