↓ Skip to main content

Third-party disability in family members of people with aphasia: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Disability & Rehabilitation, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Third-party disability in family members of people with aphasia: a systematic review
Published in
Disability & Rehabilitation, July 2013
DOI 10.3109/09638288.2012.735341
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meghann Grawburg, Tami Howe, Linda Worrall, Nerina Scarinci

Abstract

The WHO's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) describes third-party disability as the disability experienced by significant others as a consequence of their family members' health condition (WHO, 2001). A systematic review of the literature was conducted to summarize the current knowledge of third-party disability in aphasia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 217 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Student > Master 17 8%
Researcher 8 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 2%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 113 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 42 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 8%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Arts and Humanities 3 1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 119 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Disability & Rehabilitation
#3,444
of 4,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,285
of 206,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Disability & Rehabilitation
#32
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.