| Title |
Methods to assess the impact of extraction of non-timber tropical forest products on plant populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic Botany, July 1993
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02862289 |
| Authors |
Pamela Hall, Kamaljit Bawa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 20% |
| Unknown | 22 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 29 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#4,734,949
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#143
of 846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,453
of 20,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them