| Title |
Land use impacts on biodiversity in LCA: a global approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11367-012-0412-0 |
| Authors |
Laura de Baan, Rob Alkemade, Thomas Koellner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 573 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 7 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 557 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 124 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 108 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 91 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 4% |
| Other | 73 | 13% |
| Unknown | 125 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 192 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 85 | 15% |
| Engineering | 54 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 55 | 10% |
| Unknown | 166 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,574,522
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#73
of 1,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,671
of 175,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.