| Title |
Land use impacts on biodiversity in LCA: proposal of characterization factors based on functional diversity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11367-013-0578-0 |
| Authors |
Danielle Maia de Souza, Dan F. B. Flynn, Fabrice DeClerck, Ralph K. Rosenbaum, Henrique de Melo Lisboa, Thomas Koellner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 239 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 50 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 16% |
| Unknown | 48 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 81 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 19% |
| Engineering | 20 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Unknown | 67 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2020.
All research outputs
#5,044,747
of 23,957,285 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#274
of 979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,390
of 196,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,957,285 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.