↓ Skip to main content

Biological Diversity, Dietary Diversity, and Eye Health in Developing Country Populations: Establishing the Evidence-base

Overview of attention for article published in EcoHealth, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
Title
Biological Diversity, Dietary Diversity, and Eye Health in Developing Country Populations: Establishing the Evidence-base
Published in
EcoHealth, August 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10393-008-0180-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie Bélanger, Timothy Johns

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 2%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 113 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 18%
Researcher 19 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 13%
Social Sciences 13 11%
Environmental Science 13 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 25 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,514,847
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#372
of 710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,262
of 82,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.