| Title |
Distance and quality of natural habitat influence hawkmoth pollination of cultivated papaya
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s1742758409990208 |
| Authors |
Dino J. Martins, Steven D. Johnson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Serbia | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 56% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,514,847
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Tropical Insect Science
#39
of 325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,392
of 93,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Tropical Insect Science
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 325 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.