↓ Skip to main content

Clearing the Air: A Review of the Effects of Particulate Matter Air Pollution on Human Health

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Toxicology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 733)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
54 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
25 X users
patent
7 patents
weibo
1 weibo user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1289 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1739 Mendeley
Title
Clearing the Air: A Review of the Effects of Particulate Matter Air Pollution on Human Health
Published in
Journal of Medical Toxicology, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s13181-011-0203-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan O. Anderson, Josef G. Thundiyil, Andrew Stolbach

Abstract

The World Health Organization estimates that particulate matter (PM) air pollution contributes to approximately 800,000 premature deaths each year, ranking it the 13th leading cause of mortality worldwide. However, many studies show that the relationship is deeper and far more complicated than originally thought. PM is a portion of air pollution that is made up of extremely small particles and liquid droplets containing acids, organic chemicals, metals, and soil or dust particles. PM is categorized by size and continues to be the fraction of air pollution that is most reliably associated with human disease. PM is thought to contribute to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease by the mechanisms of systemic inflammation, direct and indirect coagulation activation, and direct translocation into systemic circulation. The data demonstrating PM's effect on the cardiovascular system are strong. Populations subjected to long-term exposure to PM have a significantly higher cardiovascular incident and mortality rate. Short-term acute exposures subtly increase the rate of cardiovascular events within days of a pollution spike. The data are not as strong for PM's effects on cerebrovascular disease, though some data and similar mechanisms suggest a lesser result with smaller amplitude. Respiratory diseases are also exacerbated by exposure to PM. PM causes respiratory morbidity and mortality by creating oxidative stress and inflammation that leads to pulmonary anatomic and physiologic remodeling. The literature shows PM causes worsening respiratory symptoms, more frequent medication use, decreased lung function, recurrent health care utilization, and increased mortality. PM exposure has been shown to have a small but significant adverse effect on cardiovascular, respiratory, and to a lesser extent, cerebrovascular disease. These consistent results are shown by multiple studies with varying populations, protocols, and regions. The data demonstrate a dose-dependent relationship between PM and human disease, and that removal from a PM-rich environment decreases the prevalence of these diseases. While further study is needed to elucidate the effects of composition, chemistry, and the PM effect on susceptible populations, the preponderance of data shows that PM exposure causes a small but significant increase in human morbidity and mortality. Most sources agree on certain "common sense" recommendations, although there are lonely limited data to support them. Indoor PM exposure can be reduced by the usage of air conditioning and particulate filters, decreasing indoor combustion for heating and cooking, and smoking cessation. Susceptible populations, such as the elderly or asthmatics, may benefit from limiting their outdoor activity during peak traffic periods or poor air quality days. These simple changes may benefit individual patients in both short-term symptomatic control and long-term cardiovascular and respiratory complications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,739 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 1713 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 266 15%
Student > Master 254 15%
Student > Bachelor 244 14%
Researcher 157 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 103 6%
Other 235 14%
Unknown 480 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 291 17%
Engineering 157 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 147 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 5%
Chemistry 67 4%
Other 408 23%
Unknown 586 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 481. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#56,193
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Toxicology
#5
of 733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180
of 252,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Toxicology
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.