| Title |
Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Molecular Evolution, March 1983
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02300753 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Masatoshi Nei, Fumio Tajima, Yoshio Tateno |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 387 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 2% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 1% |
| Unknown | 362 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 80 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 76 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 80 | 21% |
| Unknown | 57 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 215 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 48 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 7 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 8% |
| Unknown | 69 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2023.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#284
of 1,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#995
of 8,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.