↓ Skip to main content

Poor Growth and Pneumonia Seasonality in Infants in the Philippines: Cohort and Time Series Studies

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Poor Growth and Pneumonia Seasonality in Infants in the Philippines: Cohort and Time Series Studies
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0067528
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stuart Paynter, Robert S. Ware, Marilla G. Lucero, Veronica Tallo, Hanna Nohynek, Eric A. F. Simões, Philip Weinstein, Peter D. Sly, Gail Williams

Abstract

Children with poor nutrition are at increased risk of pneumonia. In many tropical settings seasonal pneumonia epidemics occur during the rainy season, which is often a period of poor nutrition. We have investigated whether seasonal hunger may be a driver of seasonal pneumonia epidemics in children in the tropical setting of the Philippines. In individual level cohort analysis, infant size and growth were both associated with increased pneumonia admissions, consistent with findings from previous studies. A low weight for age z-score in early infancy was associated with an increased risk of pneumonia admission over the following 12 months (RR for infants in the lowest quartile of weight for age z-scores 1.28 [95% CI 1.08 to 1.51]). Poor growth in smaller than average infants was also associated with an increased risk of pneumonia (RR for those in the lowest quartile of growth in early infancy 1.31 [95%CI 1.02 to 1.68]). At a population level, we found that seasonal undernutrition preceded the seasonal increase in pneumonia and respiratory syncytial virus admissions by approximately 10 weeks (pairwise correlation at this lag was -0.41 [95%CI -0.53 to -0.27] for pneumonia admissions, and -0.63 [95%CI -0.72 to -0.51] for respiratory syncytial virus admissions). This lag appears biologically plausible. These results suggest that in addition to being an individual level risk factor for pneumonia, poor nutrition may act as a population level driver of seasonal pneumonia epidemics in the tropics. Further investigation of the seasonal level association, in particular the estimation of the expected lag between seasonal undernutrition and increased pneumonia incidence, is recommended.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 77 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 22%
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 24 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 26 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2013.
All research outputs
#20,195,877
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#173,071
of 193,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,425
of 195,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#4,250
of 4,784 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,784 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.