| Title |
The “Sarcopenia and Physical fRailty IN older people: multi-componenT Treatment strategies” (SPRINTT) randomized controlled trial: design and methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40520-016-0715-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francesco Landi, Matteo Cesari, Riccardo Calvani, Antonio Cherubini, Mauro Di Bari, Raphael Bejuit, Jerome Mshid, Sandrine Andrieu, Alan J. Sinclair, Cornel C. Sieber, Bruno Vellas, Eva Topinkova, Timo Strandberg, Leocadio Rodriguez-Manas, Fabrizia Lattanzio, Marco Pahor, Ronenn Roubenoff, Alfonso J. Cruz-Jentoft, Roberto Bernabei, Emanuele Marzetti, on behalf of the SPRINTT Consortium |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 18% |
| Brazil | 1 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Japan | 1 | 9% |
| Finland | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 557 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 554 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 70 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 57 | 10% |
| Researcher | 51 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 5% |
| Other | 101 | 18% |
| Unknown | 192 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 92 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 31 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 4% |
| Psychology | 18 | 3% |
| Other | 70 | 13% |
| Unknown | 225 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,671,926
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#94
of 1,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,442
of 430,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#5
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.