↓ Skip to main content

GAD-specific T cells are induced by GAD-alum treatment in Type-1 diabetes patients

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Immunology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
GAD-specific T cells are induced by GAD-alum treatment in Type-1 diabetes patients
Published in
Clinical Immunology, January 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.clim.2017.01.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mikael Pihl, Hugo Barcenilla, Stina Axelsson, Mikael Chéramy, Linda Åkerman, Ingela Johansson, Johnny Ludvigsson, Rosaura Casas

Abstract

Administration of Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)65 formulated in aluminium hydroxide preserved insulin secretion in a phase II trial in recent onset Type 1 Diabetes. A subsequent European phase III trial was closed at 15months after failing to reach primary endpoint, but the majority of the Swedish patients completed the 21months follow-up. We studied the frequencies and phenotype of T cells, suppressive capacity of Tregs, GAD65-induced proliferation, and frequencies of T cells with a GAD65-specific TCR in Swedes participating in the trial. Stimulation with GAD65 induced activated T cells and also cells with a suppressive phenotype. Activated GAD65-specific effector T cells were detected by tetramer staining while the frequency of GAD65-specific Treg was not affected by the treatment. Additional doses of GAD-alum increased frequencies of CD25(+)CD127(+), but had no effect on CD25(hi)CD127(lo). Our findings indicate that GAD-alum treatment primarily induced activated T cells. GAD65-specific cells were mainly of activated phenotype.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 27%
Other 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 13 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 9%
Psychology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2017.
All research outputs
#15,094,401
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Immunology
#1,983
of 2,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,329
of 422,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Immunology
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.