| Title |
Characterisation of taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) genetic resources in Southeast Asia and Oceania
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, June 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1023/b:gres.0000023453.30948.4d |
| Authors |
V. Lebot, M.S. Prana, N. Kreike, H. van Heck, J. Pardales, T. Okpul, T. Gendua, M. Thongjiem, H. Hue, N. Viet, T.C. Yap |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 4 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 24% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 55% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#300
of 808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,855
of 62,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.