↓ Skip to main content

In vitro Environmental Toxicology - Concepts, Application and Assessment

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Endocrine Disruption and In Vitro Ecotoxicology: Recent Advances and Approaches
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Endocrine Disruption and In Vitro Ecotoxicology: Recent Advances and Approaches
Chapter number 2
Book title
In vitro Environmental Toxicology - Concepts, Application and Assessment
Published in
Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/10_2016_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-945906-6, 978-3-31-945908-0
Authors

Martin Wagner, Cornelia Kienle, Etiënne L. M. Vermeirssen, Jörg Oehlmann

Abstract

Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are man-made compounds interfering with hormone signaling. Omnipresent in the environment, they can cause adverse effects in a wide range of wildlife. Accordingly, Endocrine Disruption is one focal area of ecotoxicology. Because EDCs induce complex response patterns in vivo via a wide range of mechanisms of action, in vitro techniques have been developed to reduce and understand endocrine toxicity. In this review we revisit the evidence for endocrine disruption in diverse species and the underlying molecular mechanisms. Based on this, we examine the battery of in vitro bioassays currently in use in ecotoxicological research and discuss the following key questions. Why do we use in vitro techniques? What endpoints are we looking at? Which applications are we using in vitro bioassays for? How can we put in vitro data into a broader context? And finally, what is the practical relevance of in vitro data? In critically examining these questions, we review the current state-of-the-art of in vitro (eco)toxicology, highlight important limitations and challenges, and discuss emerging trends and future research needs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Student > Master 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 14 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 10 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Chemistry 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 20 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2017.
All research outputs
#18,529,032
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#148
of 225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,052
of 420,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.