↓ Skip to main content

The ruminal microbiome associated with methane emissions from ruminant livestock

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 903)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
233 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
487 Mendeley
Title
The ruminal microbiome associated with methane emissions from ruminant livestock
Published in
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40104-017-0141-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilma Tapio, Timothy J. Snelling, Francesco Strozzi, R. John Wallace

Abstract

Methane emissions from ruminant livestock contribute significantly to the large environmental footprint of agriculture. The rumen is the principal source of methane, and certain features of the microbiome are associated with low/high methane phenotypes. Despite their primary role in methanogenesis, the abundance of archaea has only a weak correlation with methane emissions from individual animals. The composition of the archaeal community appears to have a stronger effect, with animals harbouring the Methanobrevibacter gottschalkii clade tending to be associated with greater methane emissions. Ciliate protozoa produce abundant H2, the main substrate for methanogenesis in the rumen, and their removal (defaunation) results in an average 11% lower methane emissions in vivo, but the results are not consistent. Different protozoal genera seem to result in greater methane emissions, though community types (A, AB, B and O) did not differ. Within the bacteria, three different 'ruminotypes' have been identified, two of which predispose animals to have lower methane emissions. The two low-methane ruminotypes are generally characterized by less abundant H2-producing bacteria. A lower abundance of Proteobacteria and differences in certain Bacteroidetes and anaerobic fungi seem to be associated with high methane emissions. Rumen anaerobic fungi produce abundant H2 and formate, and their abundance generally corresponds to the level of methane emissions. Thus, microbiome analysis is consistent with known pathways for H2 production and methanogenesis, but not yet in a predictive manner. The production and utilisation of formate by the ruminal microbiota is poorly understood and may be a source of variability between animals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 487 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 485 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 81 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 15%
Student > Master 70 14%
Student > Bachelor 39 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 4%
Other 72 15%
Unknown 130 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 202 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 27 6%
Environmental Science 19 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 3%
Other 36 7%
Unknown 153 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,703,644
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#12
of 903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,695
of 420,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 903 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.