↓ Skip to main content

Heterogeneous Attractor Cell Assemblies for Motor Planning in Premotor Cortex

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Heterogeneous Attractor Cell Assemblies for Motor Planning in Premotor Cortex
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, July 2013
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.4664-12.2013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maurizio Mattia, Pierpaolo Pani, Giovanni Mirabella, Stefania Costa, Paolo Del Giudice, Stefano Ferraina

Abstract

Cognitive functions like motor planning rely on the concerted activity of multiple neuronal assemblies underlying still elusive computational strategies. During reaching tasks, we observed stereotyped sudden transitions (STs) between low and high multiunit activity of monkey dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) predicting forthcoming actions on a single-trial basis. Occurrence of STs was observed even when movement was delayed or successfully canceled after a stop signal, excluding a mere substrate of the motor execution. An attractor model accounts for upward STs and high-frequency modulations of field potentials, indicative of local synaptic reverberation. We found in vivo compelling evidence that motor plans in PMd emerge from the coactivation of such attractor modules, heterogeneous in the strength of local synaptic self-excitation. Modules with strong coupling early reacted with variable times to weak inputs, priming a chain reaction of both upward and downward STs in other modules. Such web of "flip-flops" rapidly converged to a stereotyped distributed representation of the motor program, as prescribed by the long-standing theory of associative networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 116 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Professor 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 10 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 28%
Neuroscience 33 27%
Engineering 8 7%
Psychology 8 7%
Computer Science 6 5%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 15 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2013.
All research outputs
#15,274,055
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#18,533
of 23,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,232
of 194,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#222
of 320 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 320 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.