| Title |
How Well Do We Report on Compensation Systems in Studies of Return to Work: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10926-013-9435-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiona J. Clay, Janneke Berecki-Gisolf, Alex Collie |
| Abstract |
Occupational injury and work-related disability is a significant public health problem. For published research to provide a collective knowledge base for return to work (RTW) policy and practice, features of the compensation system relevant to the research must be described clearly. The level of the reporting on compensation system features is yet to be established. The aim of the present study was to synthesize the evidence for the reporting on compensation systems in prognostic studies of RTW following work-related injuries. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 22% |
| Unknown | 18 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 11% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |