| Title |
Disparities in reported psychosocial assessment across public and private maternity settings: a national survey of women in Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-632 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicole Reilly, Sheree Harris, Deborah Loxton, Catherine Chojenta, Peta Forder, Jeannette Milgrom, Marie-Paule Austin |
| Abstract |
Psychosocial assessment and depression screening is now recommended for all women who are pregnant or have recently given birth in Australia. Existing studies which have examined the extent of participation by women in such population-based programs have been primarily concerned with depression screening rather than a more comprehensive examination of psychosocial assessment, and have not been sufficiently inclusive of the 30% of women whose maternity care is provided in the private sector. Whether there are disparities in equity of access to perinatal psychosocial assessment is also unknown. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 60% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 46 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 22% |
| Psychology | 21 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 54 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2017.
All research outputs
#6,707,742
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,982
of 14,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,948
of 194,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#111
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.