↓ Skip to main content

Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor and Autism Spectrum Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatrics, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor and Autism Spectrum Disorders
Published in
Pediatrics, August 2008
DOI 10.1542/peds.2007-3604
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena L. Grigorenko, Summer S. Han, Carolyn M. Yrigollen, Lin Leng, Yuka Mizue, George M. Anderson, Erik J. Mulder, Annelies de Bildt, Ruud B. Minderaa, Fred R. Volkmar, Joseph T. Chang, Richard Bucala

Abstract

Autistic spectrum disorders are childhood neurodevelopmental disorders characterized by social and communicative impairment and repetitive and stereotypical behavior. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is an upstream regulator of innate immunity that promotes monocyte/macrophage-activation responses by increasing the expression of Toll-like receptors and inhibiting activation-induced apoptosis. On the basis of results of previous genetic linkage studies and reported altered innate immune response in autism spectrum disorder, we hypothesized that MIF could represent a candidate gene for autism spectrum disorder or its diagnostic components.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 81 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Other 6 7%
Other 22 26%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 16%
Psychology 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 9%
Neuroscience 6 7%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 18 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,137,729
of 24,677,985 outputs
Outputs from Pediatrics
#7,737
of 18,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,345
of 91,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatrics
#42
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,677,985 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.