↓ Skip to main content

Overview and Future Potential of Buccal Mucoadhesive Films as Drug Delivery Systems for Biologics

Overview of attention for article published in AAPS PharmSciTech, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Overview and Future Potential of Buccal Mucoadhesive Films as Drug Delivery Systems for Biologics
Published in
AAPS PharmSciTech, April 2016
DOI 10.1208/s12249-016-0525-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miguel Montenegro-Nicolini, Javier O. Morales

Abstract

The main route of administration for drug products is the oral route, yet biologics are initially developed as injectables due to their limited stability through the gastrointestinal tract and solubility issues. In order to avoid injections, a myriad of investigations on alternative administration routes that can bypass enzymatic degradation and the first-pass effect are found in the literature. As an alternative site for biologics absorption, the buccal route presents with a number of advantages. The buccal mucosa is a barrier, providing protection to underlying tissue, but is more permeable than other alternative routes such as the skin. Buccal films are polymeric matrices designed to be mucoadhesive properties and usually formulated with permeability enhancers to improve bioavailability. Conventionally, buccal films for biologics are manufactured by solvent casting, yet recent developments have shown the potential of hot melt extrusion, and most recently ink jet printing as promising strategies. This review aims at depicting the field of biologics-loaded mucoadhesive films as buccal drug delivery systems. In light of the literature available, the buccal epithelium is a promising route for biologics administration, which is reflected in clinical trials currently in progress, looking forward to register and commercialize the first biologic product formulated as a buccal film.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 166 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 16%
Student > Master 18 11%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 57 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 50 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 63 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,738,621
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from AAPS PharmSciTech
#138
of 1,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,570
of 300,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPS PharmSciTech
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,491 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.