You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The evolution of flower development: current understanding and future challenges
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Botany, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1093/aob/mcr122 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annette Becker, Karine Alix, Catherine Damerval |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| South Africa | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 6 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 24% |
| Researcher | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 19% |
| Unknown | 15 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 85 | 67% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,066,644
of 25,658,139 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Botany
#2,319
of 3,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,306
of 122,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Botany
#10
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,139 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.