| Title |
Estimating the organic carbon stabilisation capacity and saturation deficit of soils: a New Zealand case study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biogeochemistry, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10533-014-9982-1 |
| Authors |
M. H. Beare, S. J. McNeill, D. Curtin, R. L. Parfitt, H. S. Jones, M. B. Dodd, J. Sharp |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 152 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 25 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 31% |
| Environmental Science | 31 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 49 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2017.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biogeochemistry
#549
of 1,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,108
of 245,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogeochemistry
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.