Title |
Field-scale analysis of water and nutrient use efficiency for vegetable production in a West African urban agricultural system
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, February 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10705-012-9484-2 |
Authors |
Sheick K. Sangare, Emmanuel Compaore, Andreas Buerkert, Marnik Vanclooster, Michel P. Sedogo, Charles L. Bielders |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Denmark | 2 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Sweden | 1 | 1% |
India | 1 | 1% |
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 77 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 20% |
Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
Researcher | 11 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
Other | 15 | 17% |
Unknown | 18 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 26% |
Environmental Science | 15 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 13% |
Unknown | 25 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,514,847
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
#141
of 506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,493
of 248,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 506 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.