| Title |
A delay recruitment model of the cardiovascular control system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mathematical Biology, July 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00285-005-0339-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A.C. Fowler, M.J. McGuinness |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 24% |
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Professor | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 21% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 7 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 26% |
| Unknown | 6 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,514,847
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematical Biology
#156
of 657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,490
of 57,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematical Biology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 657 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them