You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimising triage of urgent referrals for suspected IBD: results from the Birmingham IBD inception study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontline gastroenterology, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1136/flgastro-2023-102523 |
| Authors |
Peter Rimmer, Jonathan Cheesbrough, Jane Harris, Melanie Love, Samantha Tull, Asif Iqbal, Daniel Regan-Komito, Rachel Cooney, Karl Hazel, Naveen Sharma, Thomas Dietrich, Iain Chapple, Mohammad Nabil Quraishi, Tariq H Iqbal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 50% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 4 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#608,877
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from Frontline gastroenterology
#19
of 737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,607
of 319,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontline gastroenterology
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.