↓ Skip to main content

Creatine as a therapeutic strategy for myopathies

Overview of attention for article published in Amino Acids, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Creatine as a therapeutic strategy for myopathies
Published in
Amino Acids, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00726-011-0876-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. A. Tarnopolsky

Abstract

Myopathies are genetic or acquired disorders of skeletal muscle that lead to varying degrees of weakness, atrophy, and exercise intolerance. In theory, creatine supplementation could have a number of beneficial effects that could enhance function in myopathy patients, including muscle mass, strength and endurance enhancement, lower calcium levels, anti-oxidant effects, and reduced apoptosis. Patients with muscular dystrophy respond to several months of creatine monohydrate supplementation (~0.075-0.1 g/kg/day) with greater strength (~9%) and fat-free mass (~0.63 kg). Patients with myotonic dystrophy do not show as consistent an effect, possibly due to creatine transport issues. Creatine monohydrate supplementation shows modest benefits only at lower doses and possibly negative effects (cramping) at higher doses in McArdle's disease patients. Patients with MELAS syndrome show some evidence of benefit from creatine supplementation in exercise capacity, with the effects in patients with CPEO being less robust, again, possibly due to limited muscle creatine uptake. The evidence for side effects or negative impact upon serological metrics from creatine supplementation in all groups of myopathy patients is almost non-existent and pale in comparison to the very substantial and well-known side effects from our current chemotherapeutic interventions for some myopathies (i.e., corticosteroids).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 91 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 21%
Student > Master 14 15%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Other 7 7%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 13%
Sports and Recreations 10 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 17 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#16,722,501
of 24,593,555 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#1,075
of 1,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,325
of 112,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#27
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,593,555 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.