↓ Skip to main content

Interacting Coastal Based Ecosystem Services: Recreation and Water Quality in Puget Sound, WA

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interacting Coastal Based Ecosystem Services: Recreation and Water Quality in Puget Sound, WA
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0056670
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason Kreitler, Michael Papenfus, Kristin Byrd, William Labiosa

Abstract

Coastal recreation and water quality are major contributors to human well-being in coastal regions. They can also interact, creating opportunities for ecosystem based management, ecological restoration, and water quality improvement that can positively affect people and the environment. Yet the effect of environmental quality on human behavior is often poorly quantified, but commonly assumed in coastal ecosystem service studies. To clarify this effect we investigate a water quality dataset for evidence that environmental condition partially explains variation in recreational visitation, our indicator of human behavior. In Puget Sound, WA, we investigate variation in visitation in both visitation rate and fixed effects (FE) models. The visitation rate model relates the differences in annual recreational visitation among parks to environmental conditions, park characteristics, travel cost, and recreational demand. In our FE model we control for all time-invariant unobserved variables and compare monthly variation at the park level to determine how water quality affects visitation during the summer season. The results of our first model illustrate how visitation relates to various amenities and costs. In the FE analysis, monthly visitation was negatively related to water quality while controlling for monthly visitation trends. This indicates people are responding to changes in water quality, and an improvement would yield an increase in the value of recreation. Together, these results could help in prioritizing water quality improvements, could assist the creation of new parks or the modification of existing recreational infrastructure, and provide quantitative estimates for the expected benefits from potential changes in recreational visitation and water quality improvements. Our results also provide an example of how recreational visitation can be quantified and used in ecosystem service assessments.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 3 3%
United States 2 2%
Chile 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 105 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 23%
Student > Master 23 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 44 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 10%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 5%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 27 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#3,570,550
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#44,205
of 193,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,014
of 192,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,052
of 5,396 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,396 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.