| Title |
Using the IUCN Red List to determine effective conservation strategies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-011-0091-3 |
| Authors |
Matt W. Hayward |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| Italy | 3 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| American Samoa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 254 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 49 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 13% |
| Other | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 45 | 16% |
| Unknown | 44 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 117 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 86 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Unknown | 49 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2013.
All research outputs
#19,382,126
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#2,066
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,188
of 117,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#20
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.