↓ Skip to main content

Nonlinear Regression Models for Determination of Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Content in Human Embryonic Stem Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Nonlinear Regression Models for Determination of Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Content in Human Embryonic Stem Cells
Published in
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12015-013-9454-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anton Salykin, Petr Kuzmic, Olga Kyrylenko, Jindra Musilova, Zdenek Glatz, Petr Dvorak, Sergiy Kyrylenko

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that energy metabolism contributes to molecular mechanisms controlling stem cell identity. For example, human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) receive their metabolic energy mostly via glycolysis rather than mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. This suggests a connection of metabolic homeostasis to stemness. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) is an important cellular redox carrier and a cofactor for various metabolic pathways, including glycolysis. Therefore, accurate determination of NAD cellular levels and dynamics is of growing importance for understanding the physiology of stem cells. Conventional analytic methods for the determination of metabolite levels rely on linear calibration curves. However, in actual practice many two-enzyme cycling assays, such as the assay systems used in this work, display prominently nonlinear behavior. Here we present a diaphorase/lactate dehydrogenase NAD cycling assay optimized for hESCs, together with a mechanism-based, nonlinear regression models for the determination of NAD(+), NADH, and total NAD. We also present experimental data on metabolic homeostasis of hESC under various physiological conditions. We show that NAD(+)/NADH ratio varies considerably with time in culture after routine change of medium, while the total NAD content undergoes relatively minor changes. In addition, we show that the NAD(+)/NADH ratio, as well as the total NAD levels, vary between stem cells and their differentiated counterparts. Importantly, the NAD(+)/NADH ratio was found to be substantially higher in hESC-derived fibroblasts versus hESCs. Overall, our nonlinear mathematical model is applicable to other enzymatic amplification systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 20%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Mathematics 1 10%
Computer Science 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2013.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#914
of 1,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,569
of 206,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.