↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of the Load on the Knee Joint and Vertebral Column with Changes in Squatting Depth and Weight Load

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 2,896)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1553 X users
facebook
233 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
27 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
809 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Analysis of the Load on the Knee Joint and Vertebral Column with Changes in Squatting Depth and Weight Load
Published in
Sports Medicine, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40279-013-0073-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hagen Hartmann, Klaus Wirth, Markus Klusemann

Abstract

It has been suggested that deep squats could cause an increased injury risk of the lumbar spine and the knee joints. Avoiding deep flexion has been recommended to minimize the magnitude of knee-joint forces. Unfortunately this suggestion has not taken the influence of the wrapping effect, functional adaptations and soft tissue contact between the back of thigh and calf into account. The aim of this literature review is to assess whether squats with less knee flexion (half/quarter squats) are safer on the musculoskeletal system than deep squats. A search of relevant scientific publications was conducted between March 2011 and January 2013 using PubMed. Over 164 articles were included in the review. There are no realistic estimations of knee-joint forces for knee-flexion angles beyond 50° in the deep squat. Based on biomechanical calculations and measurements of cadaver knee joints, the highest retropatellar compressive forces and stresses can be seen at 90°. With increasing flexion, the wrapping effect contributes to an enhanced load distribution and enhanced force transfer with lower retropatellar compressive forces. Additionally, with further flexion of the knee joint a cranial displacement of facet contact areas with continuous enlargement of the retropatellar articulating surface occurs. Both lead to lower retropatellar compressive stresses. Menisci and cartilage, ligaments and bones are susceptible to anabolic metabolic processes and functional structural adaptations in response to increased activity and mechanical influences. Concerns about degenerative changes of the tendofemoral complex and the apparent higher risk for chondromalacia, osteoarthritis, and osteochondritis in deep squats are unfounded. With the same load configuration as in the deep squat, half and quarter squat training with comparatively supra-maximal loads will favour degenerative changes in the knee joints and spinal joints in the long term. Provided that technique is learned accurately under expert supervision and with progressive training loads, the deep squat presents an effective training exercise for protection against injuries and strengthening of the lower extremity. Contrary to commonly voiced concern, deep squats do not contribute increased risk of injury to passive tissues.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,553 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 809 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 791 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 150 19%
Student > Master 144 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 9%
Other 55 7%
Student > Postgraduate 53 7%
Other 165 20%
Unknown 171 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 271 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 109 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 77 10%
Engineering 44 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 5%
Other 71 9%
Unknown 195 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1383. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#9,259
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#5
of 2,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26
of 207,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.