↓ Skip to main content

Walknet, a bio-inspired controller for hexapod walking

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Cybernetics, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
Title
Walknet, a bio-inspired controller for hexapod walking
Published in
Biological Cybernetics, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00422-013-0563-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Malte Schilling, Thierry Hoinville, Josef Schmitz, Holk Cruse

Abstract

Walknet comprises an artificial neural network that allows for the simulation of a considerable amount of behavioral data obtained from walking and standing stick insects. It has been tested by kinematic and dynamic simulations as well as on a number of six-legged robots. Over the years, various different expansions of this network have been provided leading to different versions of Walknet. This review summarizes the most important biological findings described by Walknet and how they can be simulated. Walknet shows how a number of properties observed in insects may emerge from a decentralized architecture. Examples are the continuum of so-called "gaits," coordination of up to 18 leg joints during stance when walking forward or backward over uneven surfaces and negotiation of curves, dealing with leg loss, as well as being able following motion trajectories without explicit precalculation. The different Walknet versions are compared to other approaches describing insect-inspired hexapod walking. Finally, we briefly address the ability of this decentralized reactive controller to form the basis for the simulation of higher-level cognitive faculties exceeding the capabilities of insects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 5%
Germany 3 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 116 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 23%
Student > Master 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Researcher 13 10%
Other 10 8%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 28 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 38 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 15%
Computer Science 17 13%
Neuroscience 8 6%
Physics and Astronomy 7 5%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 29 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2022.
All research outputs
#6,292,544
of 23,257,423 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#161
of 681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,025
of 195,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,257,423 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 681 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them