↓ Skip to main content

Interchangeability of Biosimilars: A European Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in BioDrugs, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 762)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
30 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
151 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
Title
Interchangeability of Biosimilars: A European Perspective
Published in
BioDrugs, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40259-017-0210-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pekka Kurki, Leon van Aerts, Elena Wolff-Holz, Thijs Giezen, Venke Skibeli, Martina Weise

Abstract

Many of the best-selling 'blockbuster' biological medicinal products are, or will soon be, facing competition from similar biological medicinal products (biosimilars) in the EU. Biosimilarity is based on the comparability concept, which has been used successfully for several decades to ensure close similarity of a biological product before and after a manufacturing change. Over the last 10 years, experience with biosimilars has shown that even complex biotechnology-derived proteins can be copied successfully. Most best-selling biologicals are used for chronic treatment. This has triggered intensive discussion on the interchangeability of a biosimilar with its reference product, with the main concern being immunogenicity. We explore the theoretical basis of the presumed risks of switching between a biosimilar and its reference product and the available data on switches. Our conclusion is that a switch between comparable versions of the same active substance approved in accordance with EU legislation is not expected to trigger or enhance immunogenicity. On the basis of current knowledge, it is unlikely and very difficult to substantiate that two products, comparable on a population level, would have different safety or efficacy in individual patients upon a switch. Our conclusion is that biosimilars licensed in the EU are interchangeable.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 202 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 21%
Researcher 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Other 16 8%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 52 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 54 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 65 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#948,982
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BioDrugs
#13
of 762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,111
of 428,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioDrugs
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them