↓ Skip to main content

Biofilm establishment and heavy metal removal capacity of an indigenous mining algal-microbial consortium in a photo-rotating biological contactor

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Biofilm establishment and heavy metal removal capacity of an indigenous mining algal-microbial consortium in a photo-rotating biological contactor
Published in
Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10295-012-1142-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

S Orandi, D M Lewis, N R Moheimani

Abstract

An indigenous mining algal-microbial consortium was immobilised within a laboratory-scale photo-rotating biological contactor (PRBC) that was used to investigate the potential for heavy metal removal from acid mine drainage (AMD). The microbial consortium, dominated by Ulothrix sp., was collected from the AMD at the Sar Cheshmeh copper mine in Iran. This paper discusses the parameters required to establish an algal-microbial biofilm used for heavy metal removal, including nutrient requirements and rotational speed. The PRBC was tested using synthesised AMD with the multi-ion and acidic composition of wastewater (containing 18 elements, and with a pH of 3.5 ± 0.5), from which the microbial consortium was collected. The biofilm was successfully developed on the PRBC's disc consortium over 60 days of batch-mode operation. The PRBC was then run continuously with a 24 h hydraulic residence time (HRT) over a ten-week period. Water analysis, performed on a weekly basis, demonstrated the ability of the algal-microbial biofilm to remove 20-50 % of the various metals in the order Cu > Ni > Mn > Zn > Sb > Se > Co > Al. These results clearly indicate the significant potential for indigenous AMD microorganisms to be exploited within a PRBC for AMD treatment.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 122 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 21%
Student > Master 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 21%
Environmental Science 19 15%
Engineering 12 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Chemical Engineering 6 5%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 39 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#575
of 1,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,432
of 188,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,612 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.