↓ Skip to main content

Foot and mouth disease in the Borana pastoral system, southern Ethiopia and implications for livelihoods and international trade

Overview of attention for article published in Tropical Animal Health and Production, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Foot and mouth disease in the Borana pastoral system, southern Ethiopia and implications for livelihoods and international trade
Published in
Tropical Animal Health and Production, September 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11250-007-9049-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Rufael, A. Catley, A. Bogale, M. Sahle, Y. Shiferaw

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 132 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 19%
Researcher 25 18%
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 8 6%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 26 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 34 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 9%
Environmental Science 10 7%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 29 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Tropical Animal Health and Production
#190
of 1,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,679
of 71,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tropical Animal Health and Production
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,384 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.