| Title |
Fisheries stock assessment and decision analysis: the Bayesian approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, March 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1018419207494 |
| Authors |
ANDRE E. PUNT, RAY HILBORN |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 536 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 3% |
| Canada | 6 | 1% |
| Brazil | 5 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 18 | 3% |
| Unknown | 479 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 156 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 110 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 65 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 93 | 17% |
| Unknown | 59 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 239 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 155 | 29% |
| Mathematics | 14 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 29 | 5% |
| Unknown | 82 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#279
of 659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,522
of 30,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them