| Title |
Effects of geolocators on reproductive performance and annual return rates of a migratory songbird
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ornithology, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10336-013-0984-x |
| Authors |
Jesús Gómez, Chantel I. Michelson, David W. Bradley, D. Ryan Norris, Lisha L. Berzins, Russell D. Dawson, Robert G. Clark |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 30% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 75 | 68% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2014.
All research outputs
#5,012,806
of 24,945,754 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#450
of 1,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,005
of 202,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,945,754 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.