| Title |
Impacts of fish aggregation devices on size structures of skipjack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aquatic Ecology, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10452-012-9405-0 |
| Authors |
Xuefang Wang, Liuxiong Xu, Yong Chen, Guoping Zhu, Siquan Tian, Jiangfeng Zhu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 21% |
| Researcher | 7 | 21% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 27% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,514,847
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Ecology
#92
of 518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,066
of 164,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Ecology
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 518 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.