↓ Skip to main content

Bio-folio: applying portfolio theory to biodiversity

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
186 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
318 Mendeley
Title
Bio-folio: applying portfolio theory to biodiversity
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, April 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:bioc.0000011729.93889.34
Authors

Frank Figge

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Brazil 4 1%
Canada 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 297 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 72 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 19%
Student > Master 48 15%
Professor 21 7%
Student > Bachelor 16 5%
Other 52 16%
Unknown 48 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 102 32%
Environmental Science 78 25%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 23 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 3%
Other 30 9%
Unknown 66 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2014.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,179
of 2,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,865
of 64,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.