| Title |
Do we need species-specific guidelines for catch-and-release recreational angling to effectively conserve diverse fishery resources?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, May 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-004-7845-0 |
| Authors |
Steven J. Cooke, Cory D. Suski |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Argentina | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Mozambique | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 289 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 67 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 12% |
| Other | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 13% |
| Unknown | 44 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 148 | 48% |
| Environmental Science | 72 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Unknown | 54 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,631,865
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#387
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,405
of 59,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.