↓ Skip to main content

The role of learning in fish behaviour

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, June 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
Title
The role of learning in fish behaviour
Published in
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, June 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00042881
Authors

James D. Kieffer, Patrick W. Colgan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 196 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 21%
Student > Bachelor 36 18%
Researcher 31 15%
Student > Master 24 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 36 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 108 53%
Environmental Science 24 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Neuroscience 3 1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 42 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#353
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,874
of 19,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them