↓ Skip to main content

Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Small, High-Affinity Siglec‑7 Ligands: Toward Novel Inhibitors of Cancer Immune Evasion

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Small, High-Affinity Siglec‑7 Ligands: Toward Novel Inhibitors of Cancer Immune Evasion
Published in
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, January 2017
DOI 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01111
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Natural killer cells are able to directly lyse tumor cells, thereby participating in the immune surveillance against cancer. Unfortunately, many cancer cells use immune evasion strategies to avoid their eradication by the immune system. A prominent escape strategy of malignant cells is to camouflage themselves with Siglec-7 ligands, thereby recruiting the inhibitory receptor Siglec-7 expressed on the NK cell surface which subsequently inhibits NK-cell-mediated lysis. Here we describe the synthesis and evaluation of the first, high-affinity low molecular weight Siglec-7 ligands to interfere with cancer cell immune evasion. The compounds are Sialic acid derivatives and bind with low micromolar Kd values to Siglec-7. They display up to a 5000-fold enhanced affinity over the unmodified sialic acid scaffold αMe Neu5Ac, the smallest known natural Siglec-7 ligand. Our results provide a novel immuno-oncology strategy employing natural immunity in the fight against cancers, in particular blocking Siglec-7 with low molecular weight compounds.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Denmark 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 61 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Professor 4 6%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 17 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 17 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 19 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2017.
All research outputs
#20,400,885
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
#21,625
of 22,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#353,486
of 417,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
#121
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.