| Title |
Laparoscopic versus open repair of parastomal hernias: an ACS-NSQIP analysis of short-term outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-013-3062-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wissam J. Halabi, Mehraneh D. Jafari, Joseph C. Carmichael, Vinh Q. Nguyen, Steven Mills, Michael Phelan, Michael J. Stamos, Alessio Pigazzi |
| Abstract |
Parastomal hernia (PSH) is a frequent complication following the creation of a stoma. While a significant number of cases require operative management, data comparing short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open repair of parastomal hernias are limited. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 23% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 57% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2013.
All research outputs
#12,586,667
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#2,467
of 6,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,710
of 194,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#16
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,006 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.