↓ Skip to main content

Coding and traceability: cells and tissues in North America

Overview of attention for article published in Cell and Tissue Banking, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Coding and traceability: cells and tissues in North America
Published in
Cell and Tissue Banking, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10561-010-9219-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott A. Brubaker, Diane Wilson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 5%
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 17 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 16%
Researcher 3 16%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Computer Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2011.
All research outputs
#7,514,847
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Banking
#70
of 290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,916
of 94,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Banking
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 290 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.