↓ Skip to main content

Deformable Templates Guided Discriminative Models for Robust 3D Brain MRI Segmentation

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroinformatics, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Deformable Templates Guided Discriminative Models for Robust 3D Brain MRI Segmentation
Published in
Neuroinformatics, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12021-013-9190-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheng-Yi Liu, Juan Eugenio Iglesias, Zhuowen Tu, for The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract

Automatically segmenting anatomical structures from 3D brain MRI images is an important task in neuroimaging. One major challenge is to design and learn effective image models accounting for the large variability in anatomy and data acquisition protocols. A deformable template is a type of generative model that attempts to explicitly match an input image with a template (atlas), and thus, they are robust against global intensity changes. On the other hand, discriminative models combine local image features to capture complex image patterns. In this paper, we propose a robust brain image segmentation algorithm that fuses together deformable templates and informative features. It takes advantage of the adaptation capability of the generative model and the classification power of the discriminative models. The proposed algorithm achieves both robustness and efficiency, and can be used to segment brain MRI images with large anatomical variations. We perform an extensive experimental study on four datasets of T1-weighted brain MRI data from different sources (1,082 MRI scans in total) and observe consistent improvement over the state-of-the-art systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 6%
United Kingdom 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 26 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 35%
Student > Master 5 16%
Researcher 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 12 39%
Psychology 4 13%
Computer Science 3 10%
Neuroscience 3 10%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 5 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,185,999
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Neuroinformatics
#138
of 402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,222
of 194,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroinformatics
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 402 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.