| Title |
Processes of normal inverse Gaussian type
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Finance and Stochastics, November 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s007800050032 |
| Authors |
Ole E. Barndorff-Nielsen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 5% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 26% |
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 22% |
| Unknown | 9 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 27 | 42% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 14 | 22% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 8 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2010.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Finance and Stochastics
#19
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,641
of 30,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Finance and Stochastics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.