| Title |
Experimental manipulation of attentional biases in heavy drinkers: do the effects generalise?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychopharmacology, March 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00213-007-0760-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matt Field, Theodora Duka, Brian Eastwood, Robert Child, Mary Santarcangelo, Melanie Gayton |
| Abstract |
In heavy drinkers, training attention towards alcohol cues increases alcohol craving, but it is not clear if effects of 'attentional training' generalise to novel stimuli and measurement procedures. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 152 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 20% |
| Researcher | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 12% |
| Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 97 | 62% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 28 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#5,197,291
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#1,301
of 5,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,130
of 87,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#6
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.