↓ Skip to main content

Animal-Assisted Therapy and Agitation and Depression in Nursing Home Residents with Dementia: A Matched Case–Control Trial

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry: Official Journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
427 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Animal-Assisted Therapy and Agitation and Depression in Nursing Home Residents with Dementia: A Matched Case–Control Trial
Published in
American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry: Official Journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, July 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jagp.2013.03.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomislav Majić, Hans Gutzmann, Andreas Heinz, Undine E. Lang, Michael A. Rapp

Abstract

To investigate the efficacy of animal-assisted therapy (AAT) on symptoms of agitation/aggression and depression in nursing home residents with dementia in a randomized controlled trial. Previous studies have indicated that AAT has beneficial effects on neuropsychiatric symptoms in various psychiatric disorders but few studies have investigated the efficacy of AAT in patients suffering from dementia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 427 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 420 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 91 21%
Student > Master 67 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 8%
Researcher 30 7%
Student > Postgraduate 24 6%
Other 69 16%
Unknown 113 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 77 18%
Psychology 73 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 66 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 7%
Social Sciences 20 5%
Other 44 10%
Unknown 116 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,602,841
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry: Official Journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry
#336
of 2,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,439
of 210,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry: Official Journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry
#4
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.