↓ Skip to main content

The Natural History of Children with Severe Combined Immunodeficiency: Baseline Features of the First Fifty Patients of the Primary Immune Deficiency Treatment Consortium Prospective Study 6901

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Immunology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
The Natural History of Children with Severe Combined Immunodeficiency: Baseline Features of the First Fifty Patients of the Primary Immune Deficiency Treatment Consortium Prospective Study 6901
Published in
Journal of Clinical Immunology, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10875-013-9917-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher C. Dvorak, Morton J. Cowan, Brent R. Logan, Luigi D. Notarangelo, Linda M. Griffith, Jennifer M. Puck, Donald B. Kohn, William T. Shearer, Richard J. O’Reilly, Thomas A. Fleisher, Sung-Yun Pai, I. Celine Hanson, Michael A. Pulsipher, Ramsay Fuleihan, Alexandra Filipovich, Frederick Goldman, Neena Kapoor, Trudy Small, Angela Smith, Ka-Wah Chan, Geoff Cuvelier, Jennifer Heimall, Alan Knutsen, Brett Loechelt, Theodore Moore, Rebecca H. Buckley

Abstract

The Primary Immune Deficiency Treatment Consortium (PIDTC) consists of 33 centers in North America. We hypothesized that the analysis of uniform data on patients with severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) enrolled in a prospective protocol will identify variables that contribute to optimal outcomes following treatment. We report baseline clinical, immunologic, and genetic features of the first 50 patients enrolled, and the initial therapies administered, reflecting current practice in the diagnosis and treatment of both typical (n = 37) and atypical forms (n = 13) of SCID. From August 2010 to May 2012, patients with suspected SCID underwent evaluation and therapy per local center practices. Diagnostic information was reviewed by the PIDTC eligibility review panel, and hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) details were obtained from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Most patients (92 %) had mutations in a known SCID gene. Half of the patients were diagnosed by newborn screening or family history, were younger than those diagnosed by clinical signs (median 15 vs. 181 days; P = <0.0001), and went to HCT at a median of 67 days vs. 214 days of life (P = <0.0001). Most patients (92 %) were treated with HCT within 1-2 months of diagnosis. Three patients were treated with gene therapy and 1 with enzyme replacement. The PIDTC plans to enroll over 250 such patients and analyze short and long-term outcomes for factors beneficial or deleterious to survival, clinical outcome, and T- and B-cell reconstitution, and which biomarkers are predictive of these outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 76 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 15%
Other 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 17 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2014.
All research outputs
#14,075,444
of 24,878,531 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Immunology
#933
of 1,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,264
of 199,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Immunology
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,878,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.