Title |
Metformin promotes the survival of transplanted cardiosphere-derived cells thereby enhancing their therapeutic effect against myocardial infarction
|
---|---|
Published in |
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13287-017-0476-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rongchuan Yue, Wenbin Fu, Xiang Liao, Cong Lan, Qiao Liao, Liangpeng Li, Dezhong Yang, Xuewei Xia, Xiongwen Chen, Chunyu Zeng, Wei Eric Wang |
Abstract |
Transplantation of cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCs) has been shown to exert a therapeutic effect in patients with myocardial infarction (MI). However, poor survival of transplanted CDCs limits their beneficial effect. Metformin (MET) activates AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) which is associated with cell survival. The aim of this study is to determine whether MET improves CDC survival in the transplantation microenvironment and enhances the therapeutic effect of CDC transplantation against MI. CDCs were isolated and expanded from transgenic β-actin-GFP mice. CDCs were pretreated with MET and intramyocardially injected into wild-type C57 mouse heart with MI injury. The survival of CDCs was quantified, and the infarct size and cardiac function of treated hearts were evaluated. CDC transplantation modestly reduced infarct size and improved cardiac function in the post-MI heart, which was further improved by MET treatment. MET pretreatment significantly increased the survival of CDCs transplanted into the myocardium. MET also reduced CDC apoptosis induced by oxidative stress in vitro. The anti-apoptotic effect of MET was blocked by the AMPK inhibitor compound C. MET increased AMPK phosphorylation and upregulated endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) in CDCs under oxidative stress, which might be associated with the anti-apoptotic effect of MET. MET improves the survival of transplanted CDCs in the myocardium, thereby enhancing their therapeutic effect against MI injury. The pro-survival function of MET on CDCs might be associated with an AMPK-eNOS-dependent mechanism. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 15 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 19% |
Researcher | 2 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 19% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
Engineering | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 38% |